top of page

Medical Device Development: Physics-Based Design Fundamentals

  • Writer: Mark Torres
    Mark Torres
  • Jun 11
  • 3 min read

Einstein

Einstein emphasized that when facing a critical problem, most of your time ought to be spent understanding what you're really trying to solve, not jumping to solutions. This wisdom is especially critical in medical device development, where lives literally depend on the solution, yet engineers might be tempted to rush toward technologies and features before fully understanding the fundamental problem they're solving.


Every successful medical device begins with a systematic journey from clinical need to functional prototype—a journey that must be grounded in immutable physical laws and engineering principles. The path from concept to functional prototype follows a precise sequence:


A diagram showing the technical process: Problem definition, system analysis, fundamental principles, theory of operation, practical implementation
Fundamentals-based Technical Process

This isn't just good practice—it's the only reliable way to create devices that work when patients' lives depend on them.


Medical Device Concept Development: A Physics-First Engineering Approach


Step 1: Core Problem Understanding


Before any engineering begins, you must deeply understand the clinical problem and the mechanism of action required to solve it. This means asking:


  • What biological/physiological process needs to be measured, modified, or controlled?

  • What is the current clinical workflow and where does it fail?

  • What is the fundamental physics governing the biological system?


Step 2: System Element Analysis


Identify what must be transformed to achieve the desired mechanism of action:


  • Electrical elements: What signals need generation, conditioning, or processing?

  • Mechanical elements: What forces, motions, or structural changes are required?

  • Fluid elements: How must flow, pressure, or concentration be controlled?

  • Thermal elements: What temperature changes drive the mechanism?

  • (Bio) Chemical elements: What molecular interactions must occur?


Step 3: Fundamental Principle Selection


Only after understanding the problem and required transformations can you determine which immutable laws govern your solution. The critical fundamentals include:


Step 4: Theory of Operation Development


Define precisely how the fundamental principles will be harnessed to achieve the required mechanism of action. This becomes your device's "physics-based operating manual."


Step 5: Practical Implementation and User Interface Design


Engineers devise the practical hardware and software implementation that realizes the theory of operation within real-world constraints. User interface and aesthetic design occur in parallel, guided by functional requirements and clinical workflow needs, but must never override physics-based constraints.


Medical Device Design Example: Physics-Driven Innovation in Practice


Consider developing a non-invasive glucose monitoring device that works through the skin without finger pricks or sensors. Traditional glucose monitoring requires invasive methods—finger stick blood draws or subcutaneous continuous glucose monitors. A technology-first development approach to creating a non-invasive alternative might begin by applying optical sensors and machine learning algorithms to attempt to detect glucose through the skin.


The physics-first, question-based approach starts with the fundamental question: how does glucose concentration affect measurable physical properties that can be detected non-invasively?


Using Beer-Lambert Law (light absorption) and mass transfer principles, engineers discover that glucose changes infrared absorption in tissue, but the signal is masked by water, proteins, and temperature variations. This physics insight leads to a breakthrough: instead of fighting these interference sources, use them as calibration references. The result: a multi-wavelength approach that leverages fundamental optics to separate glucose signal from background noise.


The key difference? Starting with the fundamental physics question revealed the optimal solution pathway directly, while solution-focused thinking might arrive at the same conclusion through multiple iterations, trial-and-error testing, and costly redesigns without fully understanding why the approach works.


Medical Device Concept to Prototype Technical Process


The systematic approach from problem definition to functional prototype prevents costly late-stage failures. Transition between steps requires rigorous evaluation—moving too quickly leads to design changes and development delays, while moving too slowly wastes resources.


Need help managing this process? If you're developing a medical device and want expert guidance navigating from concept to prototype while avoiding physics-based pitfalls, reach out today. Don't let fundamental oversights become the reason your device fails when patients need it most.

Axiom Management Solutions is owned and operated by a post-9/11 US military veteran.

Conshohocken, PA 19428

Axiom Management Solutions logo comprised of white and gold lettering on a blue background

Your partner in medical device development success

© 2025 Axiom Management Solutions. All Rights Reserved.

bottom of page